Elicit vs CitedWriter
An honest side-by-side of Elicit and CitedWriter on the features students and researchers compare.
| Feature | Elicit | CitedWriter |
|---|---|---|
| AI autocomplete in the editor | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Every citation verified against Crossref/OpenAlex before insert | Partial | ✓ Yes |
| Search across OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, Crossref, arXiv, PubMed | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| APA, MLA, IEEE, Chicago, Harvard, Vancouver | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| BibTeX / RIS import and export, Zotero import | Partial | ✓ Yes |
| Chat with PDFs, answers cite the page | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Literature-review table generator | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Similarity (plagiarism) pre-check with UGC bands | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| AI-likeness report | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Shareable AI-use log + disclosure statement | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Export to Word, LaTeX + .bib, Markdown, PDF | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| UGC PhD and AICTE thesis templates | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Pay in rupees with UPI | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Price | Pro $49/mo ($588/yr); free search, limited agent use. | Free. You pay only what third-party services cost us, at cost (optional, e.g. paid AI when our own server is busy). |
Elicit: common complaints
- • Expensive for students
- • English only
- • A 2026 study found supporting quotes matched only about 46% of the time
- • No writing editor
Try CitedWriter free
Verified citations, PDF chat, lit tables, similarity + AI check and an AI-use log.
Product names are trademarks of their owners. Checked 24 October 2026.